Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

A General discussion about everything other than South Park

Moderator: Big-Will

angeldeb82
Posts: 3918
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:42 pm

Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby angeldeb82 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:01 pm

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/ ... nude_.html

This seems to be getting a little ridiculous! :roll:
Still the same as it ever was.
Big-Will
Board Moderator
Posts: 18563
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 8:57 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Big-Will » Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:06 pm

I don't know which is more laughable - for Krupa to show her support of animal adoption in this way or for the Catholic League to bother itself about it.
The South Park Scriptorium
The South Park Scriptorium on Facebook

Favorite Character: Butters
Need to look for something on the board? Use the search links below: US version and UK version
Thunderhorse
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Thunderhorse » Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:52 am

:shock: It certainly is effective advertising.

Krupa wrote:"It's understandable that the Catholic League is wary of another sex scandal, but the sex we're talking about pertains to dogs and cats,"

Wait, what? No.
Image
M00ndragon69
Posts: 9593
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:32 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby M00ndragon69 » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:48 am

Why are they so offended? Isn't there nudity in alot of Catholic art?
Image
Thunderhorse
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Thunderhorse » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:54 am

M00ndragon69 wrote:Why are they so offended? Isn't there nudity in alot of Catholic art?

I think the problem is the fact that she's using their holy symbol to cover up her unmentionables, and also the fact that its a form of exploiting it commercially.
Image
Wii fit man
Posts: 11153
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Wii fit man » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:22 pm

They're just pissy because boys are getting harder to rape nowadays.
effses: Austin confirmed for turbo homosexual
butters kenny
Posts: 10137
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:19 pm

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby butters kenny » Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:14 pm

Silly catholics loosen up eh?
I Wasn't choking you I was just hugging your neck

R.I.P Chef for realz this time

( chef joined the sith so why don't you?)

R.I.P Billy Bonka
M00ndragon69
Posts: 9593
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:32 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby M00ndragon69 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:41 am

Like Peta is the first group to exploit the symbol of the cross. The cross was pagan to begin with, and now that it is Christian, and over exposed, I can think of a lot of other ways it is exploited, that are in much worse taste. Like these cheap ass ugly shirts I have seen in the Walmart men's department that have black, somewhat gothic looking crosses on them. There are a lot of examples of ugly, cheap ass sh*t, that is on the market simply because whoever made it figured that someone would buy it because there was a cross on it. If that isn't exploiting a religious symbol comercially, then what is? Shouldn't that be offensive to religious people?
Image
Thunderhorse
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Thunderhorse » Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:36 am

M00ndragon69 wrote:Like Peta is the first group to exploit the symbol of the cross. The cross was pagan to begin with, and now that it is Christian, and over exposed, I can think of a lot of other ways it is exploited, that are in much worse taste. Like these cheap ass ugly shirts I have seen in the Walmart men's department that have black, somewhat gothic looking crosses on them. There are a lot of examples of ugly, cheap ass sh*t, that is on the market simply because whoever made it figured that someone would buy it because there was a cross on it. If that isn't exploiting a religious symbol comercially, then what is? Shouldn't that be offensive to religious people?

I agree, but maybe I used the wrong word. I meant they should get fussy over the fact she's posing with a cross to further the effectiveness of the advert. Now before you all jump on me for being a bible-thumper, I am not crazy with church and the like. I'm just a guy with Christian values. (I have a feeling I misworded that as well)
Image
M00ndragon69
Posts: 9593
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:32 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby M00ndragon69 » Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:43 am

Well, personally I think that even if I was a Christian, I wouldn't be offended..There was nudity in the ad, but it was tasteful nudity, it wasn't like what you see in something like Hustler, where you would be looking at her whole snatch. You can't even see her nipples.

I have also taken art, and art history. Life drawing was a part of this, and in that class, naked chicks would come into our classes and we would draw them. In the art history classes, I remember seeing some examples of Christian art that had nudity in it. I have also seen other examples of this outside of class. Because of having at least some background in art, I know that nudity doesn't always equal pornography, and I think even some Christians don't have a problem with nudity in art either.

Besides, wouldn't you think angels would be naked?
Image
BRMBug
Posts: 18534
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:43 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby BRMBug » Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:02 am

No, this needs to be discussed in depth some more. Soooo... dibs on humping her leg!
Big-Will
Board Moderator
Posts: 18563
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 8:57 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Big-Will » Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:28 am

Captain__fag wrote:Can't we just say all Catholics are fags and move on?

Awesome username/post combination. :)

I could see the Catholic League getting upset if the cross were actually a crucifix, but it's just a cross, and the League would wonder why there isn't more outrage about it in the Christian community.
The South Park Scriptorium
The South Park Scriptorium on Facebook

Favorite Character: Butters
Need to look for something on the board? Use the search links below: US version and UK version
BRMBug
Posts: 18534
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:43 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby BRMBug » Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:50 am

But still, I think it's a tad over the top.
Big-Will
Board Moderator
Posts: 18563
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 8:57 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby Big-Will » Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:35 am

M00ndragon69 wrote:Besides, wouldn't you think angels would be naked?

Probably. We're just used to seeing them in robes unless they're baby cherubs, with or without exposed genitalia.
The South Park Scriptorium
The South Park Scriptorium on Facebook

Favorite Character: Butters
Need to look for something on the board? Use the search links below: US version and UK version
M00ndragon69
Posts: 9593
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:32 am

Re: Catholic League slams PETA ads of Joanna Krupa

Postby M00ndragon69 » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:09 am

Remember Alan Rickman's angel character in Dogma, how he didn't actually have genitals? LOL..
Image

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests