farswept wrote:There was an actual mystery of a urinal deuce when I was in kindergarten (or was it 1st grade - had the same classroom for both, can't be sure). At the time I thought it was pretty weird that the teacher (old woman, btw) would cuss out the entire class about it, with the girls present. I didn't think it was right the girls should know about our special boy pee-toilets. (Yeah, why should they be privy to that? nyuk nyuk.)
But then there was that time I did let a girl notice me pitching a tent in that class (shush you - I was still a regular student at the time.)
Dude, we don't have to know EVERYTHING!!
BRMBug wrote:Ooh, mine's sort of pointing in this direction <, and it's huuuuuge!
I got a dually:
This is a difficult topic to deal with and under that circumstances it's a good episde which had some good laughs. Still, the end was confusing and a little bit unsatisfying.
So these 700 architects are retarded?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX7lkFpa ... r_embedded
And these 200 high-ranking miltary personel, including some who used to fly the same planes that were supposed to protect us on that day, are retarded?
LT. Col. Robert Bowman, retarded?
And of course the definitive debunking of the 9/11 debunkers by Dr. David Ray Griffin...
http://www.archive.org/details/Dr-David ... May16-2007
It's so sad to see such prominent and tallented rebels join the lock-step mainstream march towards ignorance.
The only people with the proper credentials to even form an opinion on why/how the towers fell are those architects. Do you have any architects on staff, or did the data just occurr to you?
Do some research. A great many more peices of the puzzle have been unearthed in recent years.
NO. In fact the only comments Bin Laden has ever made on the subject were to DENY any involvement. When you consider that his esteem among his constituents would be even that much greater if he WERE to claim responsibility, it seems rather odd that he would deny it.
The whole point of terrorism is to let everyone know precisely WHO to be affraid of. That's why any time there is a terrorist attack, it's always followed within hours by a claim of responibility. Why go to all the trouble to send a message and then leave it as an unsolved crime? Unless of course your goal is simple anarchy.
Here is the FBI's "Most Wanted" post for Bin Laden....
Notice, there is no mention of 9/11.
When the director of the FBI was asked why, his reply was that they had no solid evidence of his involvement. Wouldn't a taped confession qualify as solid evidence? Yes it would, if one existed.
Pakistan even offered to turn Bin Laden over to us if we could provide any evidence. Even now, we have never taken them up on their offer.
not a lot better then this one.
Great/ only miss, if you can call it a miss...Cartman disappears after he blames Kyle. It's interesting to make a switch of lead character but that's not the proper way to do it.
Something funny's going on with this 9/11 explanation the government's cooked up. There's no way a building could collapse like that from an airplane crash.
That's why I believe there had to have been charges set at locations inside the towers to make them come down that way.
When we find the Muslim terrorists who put them there, I hope we gag them with bacon, light them on fire and throw them off Sears Tower!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 2 guests