tweekslady wrote:Cartman's Top Enemy wrote:Since this point is being ignored, I'll repost it.Schantrac wrote:And dude, don't ask us to point us what YOU POSTED, just read over your last post.
To clarify once more, here's what I wrote and read over, per your suggestion:Cartman's Top Enemy wrote:I hope some of you never serve in a jury for a rape case--you'd let the rapist free.
I did not compare to what Nommel did to me to a rape. You can't point to it because it was never there to begin with.
I compared the ATTITUDES of those who to those who would blame the victim for a rape.
Get it, now?
We ignored it because you are a dumb f*ck, it was a joke!" Nommel is a rapest now LAWL" DUH. YOU COMPARED IT TO A RAPE CASE,THEREFORE WE MADE NOMMEL THE RAPEST. Got it now? I hope so.
I got the fact that, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you STILL want to insist that I'm comparing what happened to rape. Who's the real dumb f*ck, here.
I asked that someone point out to me where exactly I said that this was comparable to a rape. Nobody has yet to do so not because it's clear that I was right but because it would negate all of the clever insults you’ve made on my behalf and you would have to admit you were wrong. You would rather deny the truth, despite that it’s staring right at you and everyone else from the screen, than have to admit I was right.
I can see why you’re willing to defend what Nommel’s behavior.
If we’re going to use this post to reminisce, permit me to do so: I remember when this BBS knew the difference between right and wrong, where way-out-of-line actions towards another member was dealt with and nobody was chastised for bringing injustice to everyone else’s attention.
A mod should lock this thread already. We don't need to start up stuff again..
Until I make a better one anyways.
My soundclick profile.
Nommel tends to not take anything seriously so I'm sure he would have got the joke...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest