Come, Liberals, and Bitch about Bill!

[gtaca2005]

Example of Kieth VS Bill on air war:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL2c2oOv ... re=related

[ShaneHaughey]

The same does NOT apply to O'Rilley because, as much as your 'anchor/commentator' distinction would deny it, most people use Billo as a source of news, and very few would use SP in such a way. He passes his oppinions off as facts too much, and is given too grand a seat of authority.

Bolded what the issue is.

If you KNOW what you're getting when you watch O'Reilly, 99.9% of all problems people have with him are lessened because you realize you're dealing with opinions and conjecture and not pure facts. I agree with him sometimes- other times, I disagree. But I always know what I'm agreeing with/disagreeing with are opinions.

FYI, SS asked me on MSN if Bill said that about SP fans. In his book, he mentioned BLU, saying that it was a shame that they had cute kids saying such things. After "Goobacks" premiered, they used that clip when he was in the show and after they watched it he chuckled and said, "Well, I guess I do say allright too much."

[superiorsavior]

I know that any problems with O'Riley melt away the moment you acknowledge that he's all (generally) baseless oppinion, it makes him the funniest comedy Charactar with three dimentions, I just think there's so many stupid people in the world that would think he's a source of facts, which makes him an annoyance.

Like I said on MSN, I just said it to see how many of the people on this thread would actually believe on the basis of their hate alone that O'Riley said that he hated South Park, on this site the equivelent of saying he liked eating babbies.

[gtaca2005]

SS, I thought you meant Olbermann said that.

[superiorsavior]

I've never actually watched Olbermann, so I can't really comment there, though from what I hear he's about as bias and childish as Billo. He may be right and bill may be wrong, but he's still as flawed as Bill if he uses the same illogical path to his conclusions and the same childish methods to communicate them with.

[gtaca2005]

I've never actually watched Olbermann, so I can't really comment there, though from what I hear he's about as bias and childish as Billo. He may be right and bill may be wrong, but he's still as flawed as Bill if he uses the same illogical path to his conclusions and the same childish methods to communicate them with.

He's more out spoken than Bill.

Childish, though? Mabey immature.... But that makes him funny.
He is actually really intellectual, if you listen to his "Special Comments". He is a very good writer, and may be good at writing poetry.

Look what I mean:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#26649407
(OMG! Another video! Just shut up... Please.)

[superiorsavior]

I watched that video and from what I've seen he seems to be a lot less emotive and condacending than Bill, and generally better than my expectations, despite what I'm about to say. "Sociological pornography" though? "Aiding and abbeting the world's most hated man"? When he says things like that he sounds like the kind of loonatic film critics who write books on the hidden meaning behind an episode of Tom and Jerry; whyhe analyses the Rhetoric of a Republican party convention with such seriousness, when you could pick out the surface flaws they actually did perform. They want to win at all costs and don't care how many people they disrespect while doing it. They are as bad as the terrorists when they use the "vote for us or DIE" argument. But instead of stopping there and ripping them for what they actually said that was wrong, he spends most of his time on things which are only contraversially bad, and which he probably wouldn't see a flaw in if the Democrats did it (playing footage of 9/11 in a 9/11 tribute Making exagerated promises at election time ).

[gtaca2005]

Just watch the RNCs video to see how they actually get the crowed scared and wanting more war, then you'll understand Kieth's anger:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVtZGczFdpg

[superiorsavior]

I'd be more angry at the crowd for buying into that kind of propaganda :p

[triplemultiplex]

You guys are arguing over who's the bigger cable news blowhard? That's so funny. Anyone who hosts a primetime cable news/opinion show is a blowhard douche and that should be noted when considering anything they say.

[gtaca2005]

You guys are arguing over who's the bigger cable news blowhard? That's so funny. Anyone who hosts a primetime cable news/opinion show is a blowhard douche and that should be noted when considering anything they say.

Everyone has their dog in a fight, though...

Anyway, they're the same person in opposite universes, so You're right there...

[Michaeloptv]

Olbermamn is great at making people laugh at the idiotic humor of people like BIllo.

That's all. He is not a good election commentator, that's why he was replaced. He just has that style that makes people look stupid, and he good at laughing at that.

Billo just cannot get his facts straight, and he takes everything WAY too personally.

[superiorsavior]

You guys are arguing over who's the bigger cable news blowhard?

We need to know who to present he biggest douch in the universe award to... there's only one award you know?

And no one needs to help me laugh at Bill, except Bill himself XD

[M00ndragon69]

You guys are arguing over who's the bigger cable news blowhard?

We need to know who to present he biggest douch in the universe award to... there's only one award you know?

And no one needs to help me laugh at Bill, except Bill himself XD

Yeah so many people in politics and the media deserve that title it is hard to choose.

[gtaca2005]

You should take this quiz everyone:
http://franz.org/quiz.htm

I scored a 13, right between Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton.

Another quiz tells me that I have no party...

You want government out of people's personal lives, but you appear to desire some continued government control over people's economic activities. There is no political party that represents your views. The Green Party does run many candidates with similar views, but the overall Green Party platform is much more socialistic than you are. You would need a mix of Democratic, Green, and Libertarian politicians in office to get the balance of freedom and social justice you desire. The ratio between these depends on how high up your dot is on the chart.

Another said:

You are a Reality-Based Intellectualist, also known as the liberal elite. You are a proud member of what’s known as the reality-based community, where science, reason, and non-Jesus-based thought reign supreme.

And another:

You are a moderate Democrat. You agree with Democrats more often than not, but have misgivings about some of their positions on key social issues, as well as their ability to defend the country. You remain supportive for now, but if Democrats keep moving to the left and taking their cues from people like Michael Moore, you may decide to jump ship.

Presidential Matches:

82% Chris Dodd (D)
82% Mike Gravel (D)
80% Barack Obama (D)
79% Hillary Clinton (D)
79% John Edwards (D)
77% Dennis Kucinich (D)
77% Bill Richardson (D)
76% Joe Biden (D)
43% Rudy Giuliani (R)
34% John McCain (R)
33% Mike Huckabee (R)
31% Ron Paul (R)
29% Tom Tancredo (R)
27% Mitt Romney (R)
19% Fred Thompson (R)

2008 Presidential Candidate Matching Quiz