FORUM
*1001: The Return of Chef*
Moderator: Big-Will
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:37 pm
I finally saw it just now via Mr. Twig.
The episode on the whole seemed awkward. Maybe it was Chef's choppy dialogue, or maybe I'm just out of the groove. It wasn't bad or anything, just strange.
I loved the "Previously on South Park" bit. How many times have they made fun of "to be continued" episodes on TV anyway?
I also liked the sad ending. I hoped a bit that they would let Chef's character remain independent of the actor, but I guess the statement has to come first. And since when has SP respected the sanctity of characterization? And I always appreciate a good Star Wars reference.
A good episode. Not perfect, but well worth my time.

The episode on the whole seemed awkward. Maybe it was Chef's choppy dialogue, or maybe I'm just out of the groove. It wasn't bad or anything, just strange.
I loved the "Previously on South Park" bit. How many times have they made fun of "to be continued" episodes on TV anyway?
I also liked the sad ending. I hoped a bit that they would let Chef's character remain independent of the actor, but I guess the statement has to come first. And since when has SP respected the sanctity of characterization? And I always appreciate a good Star Wars reference.
A good episode. Not perfect, but well worth my time.
.
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:14 pm
Re: Stardust Memories
nojo wrote:Just don't resent those of us who also enjoy the more recent seasons.
Alright, but you gotta do the same. I'm not saying you've actually done anything (quite the opposite actually), but that's a big problem on this board. If you have a dissenting opinion than you'll be berated until you quit or die.

Re: Stardust Memories
Tweeks_Coffee wrote:nojo wrote:Just don't resent those of us who also enjoy the more recent seasons.
Alright, but you gotta do the same. I'm not saying you've actually done anything (quite the opposite actually), but that's a big problem on this board. If you have a dissenting opinion than you'll be berated until you quit or die.
O rly?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:21 pm
Makes Sense
They should bring back chef like kenny or say that the chef that died wasent the real chef like a clone or something,one question is the darth chef going to come back to destroy them or somthing
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:34 pm
-
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 5:36 am
Re: Stardust Memories
I was thinking the reason some people do not like the newer episodes is because they are too young to understand the humor. I’m an “old timer” that enjoys the show.nojo wrote:The show isn't any less funny, but these days it's funny in ways the old-timers don't enjoy -- "too political" seems the verdict.
marklar-mike wrote:o come on nojo, you gotta admit, south park is not as funny as it used to be. I will at least give Matt and Trey and the writers credit for TRYING but not credit for success in doing so.
nojo wrote:I agree: South Park is not as funny as it used to be…It's funnier.
That was an excellent response, nojo.
“20 yrs from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn’t do than by the ones you did. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from safe harbour. Catch trade winds in your sails. Explore_Dream_Discover” TWAIN
Re: Stardust Memories
Misty_Park_3R wrote:I was thinking the reason some people do not like the newer episodes is because they are too young to understand the humor.
Something like that, most likely.
Big Will, for example, has a link to South Park's "Jump the Shark" page:
http://www.jumptheshark.com/s/southpark.htm
Second item, from who knows how many years ago: "When 8 year olds started watching it."
But to be generous about it, it's not so much the "political" episodes -- SP has always been political, or at least politically incorrect -- but the balance of episodes that seem to annoy a significant contingent of old-timers. They want more of those flat-out raunchy episodes that don't require annotation to enjoy.
And really, you can't fault them for it. One of the charms of South Park is the characters themselves -- not only the kids, but the grown-ups. (Randy at the ballpark, itching for a fight with the other dads...) Lurking beneath everything else is -- surprise! -- a classic character-driven comedy. If Chef really were just a cardboard cutout, none of us would care about his fate.
Still, I've been asked to cite a recent "classic" episode that stands up to the rest, and this time I'll be serious: Last year's anime episode. That was a feat of imagination that still impresses me -- and just one reason why, to my taste, the series keeps getting better with each season.
Those items are arranged chronologically, I hope. The last two items are:
You actually believed that?
- I used to love this show's willingness to deal with controversial issues, engage in satire, and push the envelope, but South Park seems to have lost its soul. Many of the people, groups, and issues they tackle these days are basically subjected to petty attacks with very little real satire. SP was never very subtle, but it seems that too many recent episodes I've seen have left me more annoyed than entertained or enlightened.
- I am a huge fan of South Park and will continue to watch this show. That being said, "The Return of Chef" saw South Park not only jumping the shark, but throwing the shark off the cliff, disemboweling the shark, and had the shark torn apart by wild animals. I never had a problem with South Park making fun of any religion (even if I'm a Christian) and certainly wouldn't have a problem with Matt and Trey talking about the departure of Isaac Hayes. However, the show was simply not funny. I didn't laugh once and I was in shock watching Chef get killed in the most mean-spirited way possible. They could have handled the whole Isaac Hayes thing in a a better way and tacking on a funeral at the end didn't make things better. If they weren't angry at "Chef," why the venom towards him? Another shark jump has nothing really to do with the show, but the separation of fans into two camps, those who didn't like the episode and those who did and now make fun of the former. Jeez, a person doesn't like ONE episode and suddenly they're the Antichrist and go golfing with Tom Cruise each Sunday. Now my rant is over, let me say that I'll continue to watch South Park, but I'm worried that the guys have just lost their touch.
nojo wrote:(By the way, aren't we still owed a Lemmiwinks sequel?)
You actually believed that?
The South Park Scriptorium
The South Park Scriptorium on Facebook
Favorite Character: Butters
Need to look for something on the board? Use the search links below: US version
The South Park Scriptorium on Facebook
Favorite Character: Butters
Need to look for something on the board? Use the search links below: US version
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:02 am
-
- Posts: 9593
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:32 am
Big-Will wrote:Those items are arranged chronologically, I hope. The last two items are:
- I used to love this show's willingness to deal with controversial issues, engage in satire, and push the envelope, but South Park seems to have lost its soul. Many of the people, groups, and issues they tackle these days are basically subjected to petty attacks with very little real satire. SP was never very subtle, but it seems that too many recent episodes I've seen have left me more annoyed than entertained or enlightened.
- I am a huge fan of South Park and will continue to watch this show. That being said, "The Return of Chef" saw South Park not only jumping the shark, but throwing the shark off the cliff, disemboweling the shark, and had the shark torn apart by wild animals. I never had a problem with South Park making fun of any religion (even if I'm a Christian) and certainly wouldn't have a problem with Matt and Trey talking about the departure of Isaac Hayes. However, the show was simply not funny. I didn't laugh once and I was in shock watching Chef get killed in the most mean-spirited way possible. They could have handled the whole Isaac Hayes thing in a a better way and tacking on a funeral at the end didn't make things better. If they weren't angry at "Chef," why the venom towards him? Another shark jump has nothing really to do with the show, but the separation of fans into two camps, those who didn't like the episode and those who did and now make fun of the former. Jeez, a person doesn't like ONE episode and suddenly they're the Antichrist and go golfing with Tom Cruise each Sunday. Now my rant is over, let me say that I'll continue to watch South Park, but I'm worried that the guys have just lost their touch.
nojo wrote:(By the way, aren't we still owed a Lemmiwinks sequel?)
You actually believed that?
Thank you Big Will...You hit the nail on the head. What you described are the exact reasons why I haven't been very happy with the more recent episodes.
And, as for the people who get trashed for not liking some of the new episodes, if any of you are reading this, here is a message..You don't have to take that kind of sh*t..It is your opinion, and you have the right to think whatever you want. If someone quotes what you said, then insults you, tell them to piss off..And, definately don't leave the board over that sort of nonsense..You are a South Park fan, you have as much right to be here as the people who profess to love every episode.

Return to “Spoilers/New Episode Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests