FORUM
*1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
Moderator: Big-Will
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
99 i fail wrote:addictedtoblur314 wrote:To me, this episode was definetly funnier the second time around. It wasnt as intense as the last one, but I think it was funnier. I wanted to hurt butters grandma, yet I laughed really hard at the bathroom scenes. Cartman singing about his vajayjay was really rreally funny. I'm glad we saw jesus. I dont like red, she bugs me. I really also liked when kyle argued with Stan and Stan was like 'what was that?' lol. To me, stan's character is too reasonable that he's really predictable and boring. I'm glad that kyle could pick up on his subtle ego boost.
I don't really like Stan as much as the other characters, but damn his catchy songs.
And i think it's safe to say that stan and kyle's friendship is over.
That last sentence has to be the most retarded thing I've ever heard on these forums, and trust me, I've heard a lot of stupid s***. As with all TV, producers may make characters not be friends for a maximum of 2 episodes , but then they're always friends again. This has been the 7th-9th time they've not been friends for an episode or two, but they're always perfect friends again like it's never happened. You know that M&T doesn't care much about continuity, and they forget simple thing's like the color of a person's hair. If anyone thinks they won't be friends again, and that SP will actually change that, they must be f***ing crazy. Even after "Ass Burgers", after that extreme situation, they were still friends the episode after. And situations like Cartman being a Jew after Jewpacabra, do you think he's a Jew now? No. SP just changes character relations for shock value, and they reset to 'normal' for three reasons, in some cases, they just forget, others they just decide to not continue the subject, and in this case, the change in character relations was just for the purpose of this one episode, and not to stay permanent. And as another example, they wrote Kenny off for Season 6, and brought him back in the season finale. If South Park or Comedy Central announced somehow that they intended on 'changing the show's getting stale formula' and making Stan and Kyle not friends, they would reverse that/those decision(s) because so many people would boycott the show and rating would fall, as that happened with the Kenny Season 6 incident.
Wow, I'm still doing my craziest and longest rants on an episode that came out 4 days ago. And sorry that I (probably)insulted some people with phrases like retard and f***ing crazy.
Watch your language, buster, you inconsiderate individual. I used to intern at an agency that provides services to adults with disabilities, so yeah, you did offend me.
Dont you dare bite my head off for stating my opinion. I dont know what's gonna happen in the future and neither do you, so stop. Okay?
Um, havent you noticed they arent as close anymore? Not since 1507. I dont care that they hang around each other. When they do interact it's not the same. Maybe I did go overboard with that last sentence, but I'm just saying. It's season 16, obviously south park is changing and if people dont accept it, they better stick with watching the older episodes. Maybe not over, but cartman and kyle are increasingly getting along, and all the times since 1507 that i remember, stan and kyle have been arguing. Look, I know it sucks, and I like their friendship as much as anybody, I'm just stating my opinions here.
And announcing that cartman is a jew DIDNT change the show? I assure you i wanted to kick matt and trey about that. I wanted to kick them at the end of 1507, I dunno if everything with cartman is back to normal...but things are different in this season. I am sorry about my low opinion in stan since 1507, and yes, I do like style (not as much as kyman though, haha, but i digress) but i mean, can we REALLY predict matt and trey? I mean, really? anything can happen. It's south park.
And also, i've been friends with this girl for 16 years and we've recently drifted apart. The other person i've known for 16 years i'm still friends with, but one of them i'm not anymore. I knew her since I was in kindergarten. i So dont say it cant happen, because i think that's kind of naive. Hopefully they DO become friends again
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
99 i fail wrote:And I've been through a lot of arguments, and as soon as I posted I knew I was getting a harsh response, but I didn't care that much. If I get banned from here, not like it's the end of the world. After all, I was kind enough to use stars in cuss words. And I wasn't biting your head off for the fact you stated your opinion, just biting your head off ON your opinion. There's a difference. And when I used retard, I didn't mean for it to come out the way you interpreted it, after all, most people don't see it that way. Guess I should've used b****, huh?
>.> er, even if you would have said the full word, the filter would have censored it (which is actually really funny)
So in your mind we can post our opinions, as long as they match yours? lol, that's a bit hypocritical. Pretty sure there is a great number of people in this board that do the same thing. Also, maybe some south park fans dont take that word that way, but you arent everybody, so maybe avoid generalizing in the future. I know people who will become violent if they hear that word. Most people I know do take it that way. I dont know how else you are supposed to take it other than a very offensive word. I generally dont get bent out of shape, but seriously, how else am I gonna take it?
ps. I wont hold this against you, if you never say the r word again. I seriously dont really care that my head got bitten off, i was actually expecting it, once my temper calmed down. darn short tempers
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
Not what I meant. But of course I knew my post (which I edited for future reference, and fyi to other readers, I know the 'word' is still in the quote that was quoted of my post) was not interpreted the way I thought (my stupid brain!) it would be. But of course I am a person that's usually okay with cuss words, and even knowing what I had b4hand, used terrible judgement.
And I know I can't really take back everything I said, after all this is the internet, but my official apology for using the r word, and I meant it as a more offensive way of saying 'stupid', and not to offend disabled people in any way.
It's about 9 pm where I live right now, should probably get to bed. It's a school night after all.
This is the second time (the first time was in another occasion outside the Sp website spectrum), that I've ridiculously crossed the line, but that time I got the full consequences. Hopefully my rants won't use profanity anymore or be more like personal attacks. Even the first forum I read "Ass Burgers", I got so mad about things. maybe I shouldn't read the forums anymore? Sorry if this paragraph was TMI (being serious, not meaning that as a joke).
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
99 i fail wrote:So in your mind we can post our opinions, as long as they match yours? lol, that's a bit hypocritical.
Not what I meant. But of course I knew my post (which I edited for future reference, and fyi to other readers, I know the 'word' is still in the quote that was quoted of my post) was not interpreted the way I thought (my stupid brain!) it would be. But of course I am a person that's usually okay with cuss words, and even knowing what I had b4hand, used terrible judgement.
And I know I can't really take back everything I said, after all this is the internet, but my official apology for using the r word, and I meant it as a more offensive way of saying 'stupid', and not to offend disabled people in any way.
It's about 9 pm where I live right now, should probably get to bed. It's a school night after all.
This is the second time (the first time was in another occasion outside the Sp website spectrum), that I've ridiculously crossed the line, but that time I got the full consequences. Hopefully my rants won't use profanity anymore or be more like personal attacks. Even the first forum I read "Ass Burgers", I got so mad about things. maybe I shouldn't read the forums anymore? Sorry if this paragraph was TMI (being serious, not meaning that as a joke).
We all are so passionate about south park it's easy to bite people's heads off, which is, I suppose why we are on the forums.
And I fully accept your apology.


Oh yeah, tomorrow is monday. New preview for the new ep appears tomorrow, yay. Lol
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
I ship: Stan/Cartman <3
Stan: MMOOMM!!
Sharon: What is it honey? (gasp!) My baby's killed again!
Haa, I love that line.
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
And bullying takes many forms. There's corporate bullying, as epitomized by the lawyer who bullies the Bully Buckers guy with a cease and desist order. And then there's more abstract forms of bullying, like religion. Pushing people to do things in then name of God because they think they will go to hell if they don't.
I actually came up with this idea a long time ago in 2009, when I wrote a comedy script. The person who's trying to push for there to be an anti-bullying campaign in a school, is actually bullying the principal into making it happen. I thought it would be a funny little ironic thing.
I always get a little pissed off when South Park does something I thought of. It's not their fault, of course...it's just us thinking of the same idea independently. But they did well with this idea. And despite the fact that Stan's "make bullying kill itself" lyric was supposed to be funny because Stan is using bully rhetoric to denounce bullying and he doesn't know that, I really f*cking love that song.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:30 pm
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
I was wondering... in the credits it says Stan wrote and did everything so I was wondering if he wrote in the lyrics for Cartman singing about his vajayjay or not. Did Cartman tell Stan to do that or did Stan write it in because he knew Cartman had a point, and it would sell the video?

I ship: Stan/Cartman <3
Stan: MMOOMM!!
Sharon: What is it honey? (gasp!) My baby's killed again!
Haa, I love that line.
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
The South Park Scriptorium on Facebook
Favorite Character: Butters
Need to look for something on the board? Use the search links below: US version
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
I ship: Stan/Cartman <3
Stan: MMOOMM!!
Sharon: What is it honey? (gasp!) My baby's killed again!
Haa, I love that line.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:22 pm
Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion



Re: *1605: Butterballs* Post-Air Discussion
Return to “Spoilers/New Episode Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests